Catalyst Center to Meraki Migration StepsPrivate project overview
Pain point → operating model

Catalyst Center to Meraki Migration Steps

Migration plans become risky when inventory, configuration translation, pilot validation, cutover, and rollback are documented in separate artifacts.

Use case

Migration plans become risky when inventory, configuration translation, pilot validation, cutover, and rollback are documented in separate artifacts.

How it solves it

A staged method turns the migration into an auditable sequence with explicit prerequisites, mappings, approval gates, pilot evidence, and rollback checks.

Architecture

The design separates inputs, orchestration, AI assistance, and human verification. Secrets and environment-specific identifiers belong in runtime configuration, never in this page or source control.

Pain pointquestion or taskSourcesvalidated inputsAgenticOpsroute · retrieve · observeretry · audit · hand offAI / RAGgrounded assistanceVerified outcomehuman-safe action

Software stack

Markdown planning, structured workbooks kept outside the publish set, API/CLI mapping concepts, validation checklists.

Source-controlledTestableObservableLeast privilege

AI and AgenticOps

AI can summarize inventories and propose mappings, but AgenticOps should enforce approval gates, preserve evidence, and prevent autonomous cutover without human authorization.

Technical operating model

Ingest
Accept structured inputs and normalize them.
Reason
Retrieve approved context and produce a bounded plan.
Verify
Apply guardrails, human review, and evidence checks.

This public-facing overview deliberately excludes customer workbooks, screenshots, meeting notes, and other environment-specific artifacts.